Why I Won’t Hire You

Update 1/18/12: This post received a lot of attention. More than I would have thought. It is written in a negative tone, which is perhaps not the ideal way to communicate this. Although many job seekers disagree with the sentiments expressed, I have had dozens of hiring managers and recruiters reach out to tell me they feel the same way. Although the tone may need some work and people may not like it, the point of the article is that what most people do to get jobs isn't working, and their attitude should change accordingly.

Update 1/20/2012: To those who believe this is not realistic, see a job posting for a software engineer which references this article:

"...We have an energetic and inspired team and have an immediate need to add like minded people to our group. Prior to applying, you are encouraged to read the blog post below. While not authored by us, it's a pretty accurate and candid description of our interview thought process: <link here>"


I will be very honest with you in this post. Most interview articles only show obvious mistakes, as if most people don’t know showing up late is bad form. I will tell you the things I didn’t really know about until I was the one interviewing, and interviewing for a variety of positions and person-types. No interview prep article ever prepared me in the right way for how interviewers really think. That is what I will be sharing with you today.

When you first walk in to my office, I am expecting you to be one of the 99%+ people who I know I won’t hire in the first 5 minutes. I am hoping I will be proven wrong, because I really want to hire you and be done interviewing. Unfortunately, most people looking for jobs don’t deserve them. Here are the most common ways I know you don’t deserve any job I have to offer.

You send me a stupidly long resume

If I have to spend more than 30 seconds finding out what you have accomplished, forget it. You have annoyed me. Somehow, since resumes went digital, people feel like they can cram in 10 pages of boring essays talking about this achievement or that role, and expect me to read every juicy word. More likely, I will ignore the whole thing, write down in my notes “poor communicator”, and move on. If you have a good set of skills or something catches my eye, you might still get an interview, but I’ll still never read the resume. And you had better be a better communicator on the phone or in person.

Think about it this way – the resume items communicate to me your past successes in a (supposedly) succinct manner. If you can’t nail it in one sentence, do I really want to look forward to your rambling emails every day? If I can’t read your resume, it doesn’t bode well for your emails, and I get enough of those in my inbox as it is.

To craft a great resume, tailor it to my job posting. If I have a skill set in there like “Windows Administration”, make sure you have at least one bullet point talking about success in a project where you used that skill. Make the bullet no longer than three sentences. One is better. I am likely to read one sentence. I might read three. More than that and I won’t even know what you wrote there. You wasted my time and your own.

You can’t tell me why you like your current job

I always ask people what they like most about their current job before I get into any details about a role. Why? I want to see if you’ll be happy working in this new job. If you can’t tell me anything you like, or you tell me something you like but it sounds really generic? Then forget it, I have no idea what you want to do in life and you probably don’t either. Come see me when you know what you want to do. I would even be happy with something like “Well, this job doesn’t enliven me, but my last job, I loved doing XXX every day, and man, I miss that. It looks like this role will let me get back to that.” Let me know you're passionate or don’t waste my time.

The worst answers? “Well I like the challenge” or some other BS. Don’t BS me. I have a super BS detector, and most other interviewers do too. The worst BS is the kind where more than 50% of candidates say the same thing. If you can’t be original about what you like about your unique job how can I expect you to be creative working for me?

If you have a generic answer like you enjoy learning, the challenge, helping customers, that can be alright. Just sound excited when you talk about it. Give me an example of a time when you got really fired up about it. I don’t mind if it doesn’t relate to the job I am interviewing you for, though that helps. Just expect me to ask why you think this job will give you the same passion – and have a good answer ready. Really, why else are you applying if you don’t know this?

 

No career plans or vision

When I ask you what your next role is going to be after the one you’re interviewing for, you had better have a good answer. Everyone should have a story about why you want to come work for me, in this specific role. If you can tell me how this role helps you accomplish your long term goals, I’m much more likely to think you’ll be happy here and work hard in the job. If you just want a job, why should I care? Someone else will come to me with their vision. Eventually.

A good answer is a well thought out vision. You should have that anyway. Here is a good example: “I am looking to move away from working in my current small company to a bigger company with more career growth and opportunities. I want to rise to an executive level in the next 10 years, but my current company is too small to allow me to stretch effectively in that way. [This role] builds on my strengths in communication and project management, and will help me grow as a leader and improve my influencing skills. In a few years, I would look to becoming a senior manager…” and on with how this role fits into your life vision.

No Skills

Please, don’t bother applying if you don’t have the required skills. I will know. If you’ll be programming, expect to program in the interview. And program well. If you’ll be project managing, you had better be able to tell me about the right way to build a project plan and project vision. I’ll probably even describe a project and ask you to build a plan right there, with me. Just because the title has something in it you vaguely think you can do, if you don’t meet the requirements, please don’t waste my time. I might be ok if you are up front with me and tell me you want a career change and are willing to take a more junior position to learn. I might take a chance on you if everything else is solid. But tell me that in your resume so we don’t waste time. Yes, telling me that in your resume improves your chances of getting hired, even if not necessarily for this job or winning an interview. I won’t claim this is true for all interviewers, but it is true for me.

It’s about setting expectations. If you come in, and my expectation is, for instance, that you know Unix administration, and then you tell me “Well, I read a book and I really want to learn it”, no, I won’t like that. If instead you put in your resume an objective line “Looking to grow skills in Unix administration from a project background”, now we are on the same page. If I don’t need an expert right now, maybe I will invest in training you since you have the vision and self-motivation. Oh, and describing what you are doing to prepare is also good, even if you don’t have on the job experience. See how the expectation can change my perspective? Give me happy surprises, not unhappy surprises.

Answer my questions with conjecture

I will test you in a lot of ways. I will ask you to describe a lot of situations – where you failed, where you succeeded, what you would change, what you hate and what you love. Don’t sit there and tell me what you would do in the future. I didn’t ask what you would do, I asked what you did. If I have to wait for you to finish talking, then say “Could you give me a specific example where you did something like that?” Then you have failed to answer my question. If I ask for an example, please give me one. If you don’t have one, that’s ok, tell me you have never been in that situation, but you have some ideas if I would like to hear them. Yes, I probably would like to hear them, but I might also have another question with different examples I would rather know about.

If you don’t think well on your feet, spend some time reading through and practicing situational interview questions. I won’t ever use one I see online, but it will help train your mind to answer, and give you fresh memories to draw from. I also don’t mind when a candidate pauses to think. I will wait. I know everyone has different styles of thinking and responding.

How to Win the interview

I think it’s pretty simple. I look for a few traits in people I am going to hire. If you are missing even one, I’m probably going to pass you up for someone who doesn’t. Do your best to show off these traits and you’ll win. This is true in every case, from hiring a janitor to an executive.

  1. Show me you can get things done. This means you can accomplish challenging tasks quickly, come up to speed when necessary, go the extra mile if you have to, influence peers. You must be self-motivated.
  2. Show me you are intelligent. I will ask you questions that are designed to make you think. Show me you can. Don’t confuse intelligence with education. I don’t care what kind of schooling you had, if you can’t think, no job. If you can think, and aren’t educated, no problem in my book, though I’ll probably look for more experience instead.
  3. Show me how I fit into your vision. Truthfully, we’ll work best together if you think this job is the best place for you to be right now. I want to help you succeed in your career, let me.
  4. Be highly skilled. Unfortunately, I don’t hire awesome people who don’t have the right skill mix. But I do keep their information around for when I need their skill mix. I also tend to recommend these people to others who are hiring as strong candidates. The skill level required to be hired depends on the job and expectations. Entry level can get away with rough skill sets or classwork. Senior needs to be top of the field, regardless of years in the workforce.
  5. Be Passionate. If you are bored working in a similar job somewhere else, you’ll be bored with me. Period. I don’t want any of that.

The End

Most of the stuff I am talking about here has nothing to do with Golem Technologies, but more about what it is like to hire in the first place. There are so many articles out there with bad advice for both those hiring and those trying to be hired, I wanted to inject some raw honesty into the equation. If you are looking to hire people, then I would recommend you use my 5 points above to screen people. As for me hiring, no, I am not currently hiring, so please don’t ask me. When I am hiring though, and if you happen to apply, the above is the criteria I will use to decide.

This is true across business functions and across companies. The people who have the stuff I listed to win the interview will get jobs they want consistently. If you are lacking something, then figure out a way to get there. Just having a plan puts you ahead of 99% of job candidates. I also like giving people a chance whenever they let me, as long as I have the flexibility to do so. So far, I haven’t been disappointed.

Do you have hiring war stories (interviewer or interviewee)? Share them in the comments!

"Let me know your passionate or don’t waste my time."

Writer doesn't know difference between you're and your? I immediately stop reading since your credibility is shot!

Yesssssss this is a petpeeve!!!!!!!!! Have u not ever heard of English and Reading 101???? You're is you are your shows ownership!!!

u is spelled you

Sad, that you search for grammar issues and not look at the content of something. Learn to deal with it.

Regardless of a grammar mistake, I thought the article was great. Now that I think of it, when I failed to do those 5 things, I did not get the job!!! I' m gonna start being prepared like that at every job interview, and I appreciate her raw honesty, because sometimes people need that. Thank you, Michelle.

I thought it was a very good article, not all people can accept the raw truth. I have practiced some of her five points and have landed the job. Thank you, Michelle (name coincidence) I also had a boss that analyzed every grammar mistake but her own.

So you never made a typo? The article provided me with new ammunition for both sides of the interview equation whether I am being interviewed or interviewing someone myself. However, I will agree that people need to proofread and proofread and proofread again!

Pleasantly refreshing to hear honesty regarding interview(ers/ees).
Reminded me of this http://www.esquire.com/features/honesty0707 (slightly NSFW)

Wow you sound just like the sort of person I would like to work for. I can't say I agree with all you've written.

Great discussion of this post at Hacker News, http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3428567. Many of the comments boil down to "this is a list of reasons to never work for Charlie B".

You really knocked it out of the park. I couldn't agree more with these points. Thanks for sharing.

If a company had an interviewer like you, i would not want to work for that company.

There's a good deal of discussion taking place about this post on Hacker News.

You're focusing too much on the interview process and too little on the person. This is atrocious. I hope anyone thinking of applying to Golem Technologies sees this post first.

Actually I focus fully on the person. I am very flexible about the process as in, I don't care much about the process, but only on the results. Is the person a good fit and will they be a star on the team and happy in their job.

I believe what Charlie is trying to get at so far as the "process" is that asking these specific questions and having an expectation of what he is looking for in an end result answer is that he is looking for intelligent people. Period. In some cases I believe that an interviewer is also looking for someone who can see the bigger picture and not be so focused on the small pieces that they lose sight of that bigger picture. Also, you have to consider the culture of the company and this is where it is imperative to do your homework before heading out to interview somewhere!! Have some knowledge about the company...what they do...why they do it. Read their mission and vision statements before you even apply!! I think I would enjoy a job with Charlie. He sounds like an upfront no nonsense kind of person, which is exactly the type of people I enjoy!

It's so amazing how differently people perform interviews. I approach interviews from a completely different angle. I agree with some of your ideas and disagree with others. It's incredible that anyone gets hired when interview processes and tastes vary so widely.

I agree it's a messy field. I consume a lot of books and articles on how to find the best team, but most people have different views. This is what I have come up with so far as the best way, and generally I get great candidates as a result. I am always open to better criteria!

Funny...I wouldn't hire you either.

I love these condescending interviewer blog posts.

Nice article, could you apply it to someone who is over 60?

You make a good point. The main thing I look for in career vision is a reason other than money to be working for me. It can be things like learning, love of the work, connections, whatever. This doesn't change whether someone is 20 or 60. Granted, the examples I gave in the article are geared more towards someone who is coming in newer in their career, so they should have some idea of what their career looks like to them.

You are a dick.

I look forward to not working for you.

After reading this, I don't want to work for you.

The top comment on https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3428567 summarizes pretty completely why I wouldn't work for you. The rest of the comments apply pretty well too.

Congrats on generating some truly horrible PR - at least when it comes to hiring talent.

Wow...you're an idiot. I would never apply for a job in your company

The job market is too tight, if employers can expect this much. Well, good for you.

I /used to/ make my resume as relevant as a snort of cocaine, but then got called on to explain all the time holes I'd left, which was tedious. Perhaps it's time to try the "only what's relevant" approach again.

I wouldn't leave time gaps - but there is certainly no need to send in a half page about a job you had 15 years ago. I see some resumes where I get a whole page about jobs they had stocking shelves in high school 20 years ago listing every job responsibility, team members, what they learned, etc. It's truly hard to get it right, but I think my main point was to make your value clear in as few words as possible. Generally, that can be done with 3 short bullet points per job. I don't mind a paragraph after the bullets if more needs to be said. I will read it if the first bullets are very interesting. But still, it needs to be easy for me to find the relevant information when reading through a resume for the first time.

Terrible post.

Call me back when you know the difference between your and you're! Talk about not being a good communicator.

I think you're rush to pre-judge a persons potential contribution based on this limited criteria is very shortsighted and immature. http://wp.me/p1C1sQ-9I

Very helpful and direct!

Excellent post!

wow! Finally - practical, insightful, and timely. Thank you for your honest assessment. I'm interviewing and this is good stuff!

You sound like a cunt to be honest.

You are truly a prick, and I would rather be unemployed for five years than work for you!

This article opened my eyes and I have printed it out to review before my interviews. Thank you for the insight. It was a big help.

Good luck! I hope they go well for you!

Wow @ the arrogant tone of this article! People in your Company enjoy working for a narcissist?

Just sad....

As an interviewee, I also am very frustrated to receive a boat loads of inquiries that I am a "perfect fit" for every job under the sun when my resume clearly shows my passion is in project management and consulting.

I love my job, I love what I do, but I am also not blind that other opportunities exist and one should always be aware of what is out there and consider other offers. Two roles I held were those where someone sought me out. Plus I know people who are looking and pass along those which feel like a good fit.

I used to respond politely, "no thank you, I am not interested in a purchasing manager role" (or whatever role is tied one single solitary word on my resume.) Why not blog about the woes of the interviewee that must screen out the overzealous recruiters?

Recruiters can sometimes be a problem because they work on commission. I face some of the same issues where they pass through "perfect" candidates who don't really want the job I am offering and aren't a good fit.

You're an asshole, glad I don't work for you.

Very well done!
A really good piece of work!
Thank you for the insight.

This is exactly what job seekers need to hear - the truth!

Getting hired is hard and you are judged. Most of the information you are getting about your job search doesn't increase your chances of getting hired, it increases your chances of getting eliminated! Putting too much information on your resume will get you eliminated as quickly as not having enough info on it. Being over educated is as bad as being under educated.

Being general of non-specific in an interview is just noise and guess what... eliminated.

It is easier to get hired to do what you want to do. You do that by firstly knowing what that is and telling hiring managers exactly what it is you can and want to do as well as what they can do to support you and get your best performance possible.

Great article.

Corey Harlock - Renegade Career Coach

Thanks Corey! Tons of hiring managers agree, even if employees don't like what I have to say.

I'm confounded why people are lauding your honesty when you primarily illustrate a failing of the modern career climate. Unless you're hiring for a resume writer it's naive to expect perfection in soft skills that aren't commonly applicable to the position at hand.

It's frankly repugnant that you bemoan wasting time *doing your job*; measured in hours, days, maybe weeks, sifting through less than ideally packaged candidates whose potential value to the company will be measured in months, years, perhaps even decades.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options